Hello, dear reader(s). Just a quick heads up on some things:
ONE: Sorry for the lack of bowl rundown. Between my work computer going into the shop, my home computer breaking, abject laziness, and the fact that I'm not paid by anyone to do this, there was really no way it was getting done. Which is a pity because I finished 17-17 in my bowl picks. Yeah! In your face! Flipping a coin would have given you roughly the same results as my crappy bowl predictions!
TWO: Gotta do a rundown of the destruction of conferences, specifically the Big 12's dissolution and the parts of that conference heading to conferences that make no sense for them to join. Texas in the Pac-10? Nebraska in the Big 10, which now has 12 teams AT LEAST?! What the heck is this?! (I'm getting ahead of myself, football blogging season has just started.)
THREE: I'll try to do something involving the coaching carousel around the country. Plenty of fun to be had there, especially at Notre Dame, Cincinnati, UVa, Tennessee and Southern Cal.
FOUR: Speaking of Southern Cal...
It seems vaguely appropriate that the team that I despise with all of the enthusiasm I can muster has finally been punished for their misdeeds. Vindictive of me? Sure, but let's all be honest with ourselves: Almost every program in major college sports that has a legitimate shot of winning a championship cheats. Virginia Tech probably does. Florida almost certainly does. Iowa State probably does not, but Iowa State has a horrible football team. The issues I have with the University of Southern California are not relative to what they've done with recruiting, because in modern college football recruiting violations are so prevalent as to be utterly unremarkable.
No, what I hate about Southern Cal is their attitude. The idea that somehow they have "earned" their place among college football's elite simply by virtue of location. The concept that 100% of their players go on to have illustrious professional careers simply because they spent 4 years snuffing out inferior conference competition, mediocre non-conference competition, and one good team per year in their bowl game. The idea that Pete Carroll is some sort of brilliant coach because he took an historically good program in a rich recruiting ground and kept winning with it. The way people describe their program as having "swagger." The way the media panders to them, and the rare occasions that the media does acknowledge that Southern Cal isn't the greatest football team in the country they are immediately accused of "East Coast Bias." The "Bush Push," which was illegal, this call against Virginia Tech's Josh Hyman, which is still the single worst offensive pass interference call in football history. Pete Carroll's hair. Lane Kiffin leaving Tennessee in a horrible state after one mediocre year to coach the Mustard and Ketchup. That, among a host of other reasons, is why I hate Southern California.
Now that you have a decent comprehension of where I stand, here's some analysis: The NCAA sanctions were not harsh enough. In this case, the school had been thumbing its nose at the NCAA for years and lying to its recruits, telling them to come to the school, telling them that they were in the clear from NCAA sanctions. These recruits should have the right to transfer to another school, perhaps one that will give them the opportunity to play in a bowl game during one of their first two years at school. Plus, consider the seniors and juniors who, having missed their chance to jump to the NFL like their coach (more to come on that) are stuck spending the last years of their college career with no chance of going to a bowl or of hoisting a national championship trophy. Even if Southern Cal runs the table the next two years (they won't, but work with me here) they will still not be able to play for a national title. Aside from making the school money, the next two seasons will have little to no meaning. The athletes should have the opportunity to leave. If college football is "about the kids" as the NCAA is always so quick to claim, then the kids should be given a chance to give meaning to the 2010 and 2011 seasons. (NOTE: In the time since I typed this, it's come out that Juniors and Seniors will be allowed to transfer without the required one year of "sit out" time. Mind you, these are the Juniors and Seniors who led Southern Cal to their worst season since 2001, so...) (Plus, the Freshmen and Sophomores are still getting screwed...)
The school needs to be stripped of 5 seasons of post-season participation. That way no athlete who was in any way tainted by this scandal can play for the tainted school that tainted them. Tainted. Fun word to type.
Seriously, though, the hiring of Lane Kiffin was a horrible choice for a variety of reasons. One of the ringleaders of the circus that led to this whole affair is now back in charge of said circus. Kiffin's paying his atonement in the form of sanctions during his first two years, yet the school's punishment needs to be elevated, the better to teach boosters and crazy fans who write blogs about football an adequate lesson.
I know that sounds like the harshest of mentalities to take, but think about it: Most college athletes, even from big-name schools, don't go on to have illustrious careers. Most of them don't go on to have careers at all! For all the hype that its players get, USC football's pro track record is no better than many other schools around the nation. If you don't believe me, go to the local Wal-Mart and talk to John David Booty. If he's not working today, try finding Todd Marinovich.
The most egregious bit is that the man who built this monster is escaping basically scot free. I am, of course, referring to the Silver Fox: Mr. Peter Clay Carroll. Pete has gotten away with the murder of Southern Cal football, and he's not even sorry about it! Here's a video from his YouTube channel. (Which, by the way, PETE CARROLL has a YouTube Channel?! I could write a whole post just about that!) Watch that video and come back. I'll wait here...
...OK, so raise your hand if you believed that. If you raised your hand, then I am shocked. Because I did not know that you read this blog, Mr. Carroll. If you did not raise your hand, then you have a brain stem. "The University didn't know, we didn't know." Look, man, I'll buy that you don't know a tailback has a history of robbing stores. I'll buy that you can't keep tabs on 100 athletes at the same time. But the player at the crux of this debate is REGGIE FRIGGIN' BUSH! One of the best running backs in college football history, certainly one of the best to come through Southern Cal. If you're not keeping tabs on the recruitment of your highest profile player then you are a horrible, horrible coach. This denial is amazing. If Pete flames out at the NFL coaching level, he could easily have a career in politics. Never once during the 2 minutes of drivel you have just watched did Pete actually apologize or take responsibility for his actions. We do get an "I feel terrible" around the 1:50 mark, but that doesn't count.
In conclusion (though this topic may get revisited between now and August) this just shows the dark side of college football. Drugs have withdrawal symptoms, addiction, and life-ruining powers. College football has recruiting. Here's hoping that the season arrives soon...
Thursday, June 10, 2010
Back once more, with the seething anger you want!
Labels:
cheating,
offending people's good sense,
PAC-10,
Pete Carroll,
ranting,
sanctions,
USC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I would like to point out that even though I know your dad hates Texas, the Longhorns and several other teams (even the team I hate, Oklahoma) did the right thing by staying put. Maybe the move by the rest of the Big 12 Conference (which will have to pick up two teams to keep the name, right?) will stop some of this silliness. I hope so.
Post a Comment